2016 State Price Transparency Report Card is Released
Posted on by CATALYSIS
July 25, 2016
Review of Laws Shows Progress with Much Room for Improvement Most states could be doing more to give consumers the price information they need for making educated health care choices, according to an annual report card released by two independent health policy organizations. The report not only identifies the states failing at health care price transparency, but also lauds the few high-performing states and outlines practices lagging states should emulate. The 2016 Report Card on State Price Transparency Laws developed by the Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute (HCI3) and Catalyst for Payment Reform (CPR), gave 43 states an F for failing to meet even minimum standards. Only three states—New Hampshire, Colorado, and Maine—received an A for providing detailed pricing on a variety of procedures through easy-to-use public websites, backed by rich data sources. Oregon moved from an F to a B after a year of sustained effort to improve. About a dozen other states could quickly move up in the ratings by building high-quality websites to display data they already collect in all-payer claims databases, the best source of price information. "Real health care price transparency for consumers is dependent on rich data sources that provide meaningful price information on a wide range of procedures and services," said François de Brantes, HCI3 executive director and lead author of the report. "But that’s not enough. It must be presented on an accessible, publicly available website." The 2016 Report Card on State Price Transparency Laws is a state-by-state resource that offers policymakers, consumer advocates, and other health care stakeholders a comprehensive look at the varying degrees of progress being made on price transparency at the state level. "Many states have the laws on their books requiring the release of health care price information, but score poorly because of the design and implementation of those laws," said co-author Suzanne Delbanco, CPR executive director. "They could make relatively easy fixes by deploying the appropriate resources." Snapshot of 2016 Price Transparency Grades- New Hampshire is no longer alone at the top. Colorado and Maine each received an A due to the increased quality of their reporting and transparency websites.
- Oregon received the only B in 2016, up from an F last year, because of its sustained efforts to improve this year.
- Vermont and Virginia were the only two states to receive a C this year.
- Arkansas received a D.
- The remaining 43 states received failing grades.
- Not every F is created equal. For instance, both Louisiana and Washington, enacted new all-payer claims database legislation, but do not yet have functional websites publishing the price information they collect. If those websites are well designed and online next year, these states would expect to see their grades rise markedly.
Leave a Reply